Books… and Yours Truly!
 

I have recently made the decision to don a pair of arc-welding gloves whenever I venture out to my mailbox. So many things have been arriving there, almost daily of late, that its metal door and sides are beginning to heat up from the repeated opening and closing. I am afraid I might burn myself.

As recently as last Saturday, two books were waiting for me. One was expected, since I had ordered it from an antiquarian bookseller; the other came as something of a half-surprise. Its author had told me that publication was imminent, but I had no idea when it would actually appear. Books are rather like babies: their gestation is a lengthy affair, and they may arrive on schedule, prematurely, or even post-term. One never quite knows in advance. Especially when one happens to be on the receiving end of the phenomenon, that is, on the reader's side of things.

The Sequel to Chance
(Vinçard Strikes Again!)

Two weeks ago, I gave you a fairly exhaustive account of the arrival in my technical library of the 1823 edition of Vinçard's L'Art du typographe (see →here). The success of this unexpected acquisition gave me the itch to rummage once more through the online catalogues of antiquarian booksellers, in search of the 1806 edition (a little masterpiece) of his manual… No 1806 edition, alas. But… but… (I shall keep you in suspense a little longer) I did find his Traité de ponctuation, published in 1809. According to the Estienne copy, which happens to be the second edition, this manual went through three editions. And according to Alkan the Elder, this treatise on punctuation enjoyed a fair amount of success. (If you still haven't bought the nineteenth-century volume of  Histoire de l'écriture typographique (the History of Typographic Writing) — through a complete failure of judgment or a positively breathtaking lack of interest — click →here to put matters right and redeem yourself.)  In the Estienne copy of the Traité (second edition), the title page of the third edition has been pasted in immediately before the title page of the second. Proof, if proof were needed, that the third edition did indeed exist.

Title page of the 3rd edition .

Estienne copy: the title page of the third edition pasted in before the title page of the second edition. Without wishing to offend bookbinders as a profession (my wife would demand an immediate divorce), I must say that the person responsible for binding this particular copy was a veritable vandal. He did not hesitate to trim off the very first word of the title, despite the fact that there was ample blank paper at the bottom of the page to spare him from committing such sacrilege.

Title page of the 2nd edition .

Like the third edition, the second bears no date. The first edition is dated 1809, as we shall see shortly. Two years later, in 1811, Vinçard was stripped of his printer's licence on account of the numerus clausus. No more than eighty licensed printers were permitted to operate in Paris. Although he fought hard to retain his licence, he never got it back and was consequently unable to continue practising his trade. Perhaps this explains why the second and third editions of his treatise bear no date. It is conceivable that he defied the prohibition and printed these new editions clandestinely sometime after 1811. This would also explain why the second edition of his Art du typographe, in 1823, was set and printed by his son, who was working for a duly licensed printer.

On the page opposite this title page, on the left, we find an interesting little notice (I am preserving the rather extravagant capitalization of the original):

« Le Sr VINÇARD donne des Leçons de Typographie, et vend des petites imprimeries portatives, à l'usage de MM. les Auteurs ou Amateurs. »

In other words:

"Mr. VINÇARD gives lessons in typography and sells small portable printing presses for the use of Gentlemen Authors and Amateurs."

This might well lend support to my earlier hypothesis. Having lost his printer's licence, and with it the printing establishment that had provided his livelihood, he had to find alternative sources of income.

And now, to our recent acquisition: the first edition of the Traité de ponctuation. In other words, the original edition of the work, which one may also call, if one wishes to sound frightfully grand, the editio princeps. I was not a little pleased with myself when I discovered that what I actually had in my hands was indeed this first edition. Until now, the only copy I had known was the Estienne one, which I had photographed in order to read it.

The binding is very similar to that of my copy of the Art du typographe: marbled calfskin, with a decorative roll-tooled border. Indeed, when I placed the two books side by side, they did not take an instant dislike to one another. Quite the contrary: they adopted each other on the spot.

Binding of my copy .

The leather is rubbed through in places, and the corners are worn. These two characteristics, which might seem incompatible with admission to the library of a dyed-in-the-wool bibliophile, particularly one with a touch of obsessive fussiness (I am understating my case here, so as not to upset anyone), make this copy especially dear to me. They are proof that the book has served a purpose, that it has been read, handled, used — who knows? — by one or several people, to the great enrichment of their minds and the delight of their intellectual lives. This is an honest-to-goodness copy. Not some moribund creature that must on no account be touched because it happens to have an expensive binding by a celebrated bookbinder, the sort of binding that ought to be kept in the dark, at the bottom of a bank vault, lest the book (whose actual text is of little or no concern to its owner) lose a penny of its resale value.

But I digress. Here is the title page:

Title page.

As you can see, it is dated. Vinçard is identified as both author and printer. He describes himself as a « Typographiste ». The word is still in use today, although its meaning has changed completely. Vinçard called himself a Typographe when he was practising his trade as a printer, and a Typographiste when writing about typography. At the moment I am writing these lines, I am a typographist; when I am in my workshop, getting the tips of my fingers dirty with the toxic alloy that has served to multiply so many masterpieces, I am a typographer. That alloy, of course, is typographic metal, composed of lead, antimony, and tin.

It is this first edition of the Traité de ponctuation that allows us to understand the success of his Art du typographe. At the end of that book, Vinçard reproduces letters from several prominent personalities of the day, to whom he had sent out a substantial number of complimentary copies — free of charge, naturally. These distinguished gentlemen thanked him, and he duly published their letters of thanks. Thus, his book owed its success to a large-scale distribution campaign directed at people in influential positions. According to Alkan the Elder, some 6,000 copies were sold. This was a stroke of luck that had eluded Momoro a few years earlier. Momoro had written and printed his own manual shortly before being guillotined, which did not leave him a great deal of time for publicity and promotion.

Vinçard was, of course, by no means the first person to take an interest in French punctuation. He had numerous predecessors. To mention just one, and a particularly distinguished one at that, there was Estienne Dolet, who published in Lyon in 1540 his La manière de bien traduire d'une langue en aultre. D'advantage. De la punctuation de la langue françoyse, plus des accents d'ycelle. Vinçard's manual, however, is relatively short (168 pages), straightforward, and positively brimming with examples. The typography is clear, despite the decision to use a smaller type size for the longer examples and for poetry, so as to avoid the mortal sin of breaking a verse line in two.

Pages 10 and 11.

One may note that in 1809 the comma was still being spaced on both sides, a practice that has long since disappeared from modern French typographic and orthotypographic usage.

Pages 50 and 51.

Vinçard must have been in something of a hurry to get his treatise onto the market in this first, 1809 edition. He apparently handed the printed sheets over to the bookbinder a little too soon. The ink had not quite dried. This is borne out by the ink offsets visible here: the ink from the left-hand page has transferred to the right-hand page, and that from the right-hand page to the left. Since Vinçard was a competent printer, it is difficult to imagine any other explanation for this transfer than that the sheets were bound before the ink had properly dried. The only alternative would be a poorly manufactured ink with an unusually slow drying time, an explanation that seems rather less likely.

And so much for Vinçard for the time being. But, encouraged by the success of my two previous searches, I intend to keep hunting for the 1806 edition of the Art du typographe. Let us now turn to a completely different subject, one that also arrived by way of my mailbox.

Les éditeurs parisiens de l'avant-siècle
(Parisian Publishers of the Prewar Era)
1870-1914

If Vinçard's book was on the slender side, my friend Gilles Picq's volume is a substantial and imposing beast. Of generous dimensions (23 cm high by 14 cm wide), it contains no fewer than 621 pages, including the table of contents. What is it about? Quite simply, it is a comprehensive survey of the publishers of what might be called the prewar era — the period I refer to as the years between the wars: the war of 1870, in which the French took a sound thrashing, and the one that began in 1914, which was considerably more murderous and ended in a French victory that brought about the Second World War. Needs must! Every so often, we bipeds of all nations are obliged to invent such historical periods in order to thin out the world's various populations and avoid the scourges of overpopulation and housing shortages. But enough of these demographic musings. Back to our Parisian publishers. One cannot help noticing, incidentally, that publishers from the suburbs and the provinces are missed out, unless our friend Gilles has a second volume planned for them. That would be an excellent idea. I must remember to ask him.

Cover (and spine, to show its thickness) of the book by Gilles Picq.

Gilles has catalogued the publishers — even those who brought out naughty books, and I mention this purely to whet the prospective reader's appetite and compel him to buy — and provides an account of each one's history, from birth to death, where death has occurred, along with their respective catalogues. The catalogues are not always exhaustive, of course. When a publisher has produced several thousand books, it is perfectly understandable that not every single title can be listed. There are only so many pages to go around. This is a Herculean undertaking he has offered us. A work requiring countless operations, endless consultations of databases, not to mention painstaking verification and the elimination of errors. A madman's task, one might say. But Gilles Picq is not mad. He is patient, tenacious, and courageous. And generous, too, since he offers us this magnum opus for a modest sum. I did the arithmetic: less than €0.047 per page. Now that's a refreshing change from the price of fuel. And since we're on the subject, his book is a wonderful fuel for the mind. It sets our little grey cells working overtime, as Hercule Poirot would say, and teaches us a veritable multitude of things.

Of course, some of you will tell me that one must either be interested in Parisian publishers of the prewar era (as I happen to be), or at least possess a desire to become interested in them, to venture into this terra incognita and clear a little intellectual undergrowth in the convolutions of one's brain, making room for some new inhabitants: the publishers just mentioned.

This is not a novel to be read from beginning to end. That would be rather silly. It is a book of the codex variety, more precisely a dictionary or something very much like one. A book to dip into on long winter evenings, when the irresistible craving for universal knowledge seizes you by the entrails and refuses to let go. Best enjoyed by a wood fire, ensconced in a comfortable armchair, if you are among the fortunate; or beside a central-heating radiator, perched on a rickety stool, if fortune has been less kind.

When I collected the book, I nearly toppled forward under its weight. The weight of accumulated knowledge, naturally. I gave it a quick browse and, as was only to be expected, immediately turned to one or two subjects I had done a little work on back when I still had hair, and when that hair was black. The Mercure de France, for instance. And so I thought I might do a little illustrating of our friend Gilles's work. His publisher, L'Échappée, did not have the financial resources to offer him a book in which all the illustrations would be reproduced in color. I know how expensive that can be, being something of an insider myself. So, with my modest means and my modest library, I shall attempt to add a little color to his entry on the Mercure de France. Here we go…

In their early days, the publishers of the Mercure de France allowed themselves a certain number of editorial eccentricities, which they gradually abandoned over the years in favor of their ever-present yellow cover, adorned with a caduceus and wrapped around the familiar in-18 format. Here are two or three examples of those early flights of fancy.

Phocas, the cover.

The front cover of Phocas by Remy de Gourmont. The book is a slim little pamphlet of 32 pages, in a square format measuring just under 16 cm. The cover drawings and vignettes were done by Gourmont himself. The title of the book does not immediately meet the eye, being cunningly concealed within the illustration.

Phocas, back cover.

The drawing on the back cover. The fairly thin cover stock is dark blue Ingres MBM paper, which projects quite generously beyond the text block, with no turn-ins.

Phocas, title page.

The title page, dated 1895, bears a vignette by Gourmont and identifies the booklet as belonging to the L'Ymagier series, a periodical founded by Gourmont and Jarry that lasted only until the two men fell out over the affair of the Old Lady (Berthe de Courrière).

Le Fantôme, cover.

Le Fantôme, by the same Remy de Gourmont, appeared two years earlier, in 1893. It is in a rather oblong format (approximately 22 cm high by 13 cm wide), with a substantial grey cover on the outside and golden-brown, almost metallic reflections on the inside. Let there be no misunderstanding: the reproduction of this cover has not been accidentally reversed by the typographer CLS as a little joke, or simply for his own amusement. The title really is printed like a typographic composition.

Le Fantôme, Henry de Groux lithograph.

The book contains two lithographs by Henry de Groux, placed one after the other at the beginning of the volume. The first of the two is shown here, facing the printing statement. This statement, embellished with Gourmont's autograph signature, appears somewhat blurred. The reason is that it is covered by a thin protective tissue sheet, decorated with a pattern of little flowers, which separates the two pages: one printed in letterpress, the other in lithography. This is a fairly common practice in books illustrated by lithography or intaglio engraving. A very thin sheet of tissue paper (not always decorated with flowers, I hasten to add) is placed between the illustration and the text to prevent the ink from one impression, if it has not yet dried, from transferring onto the facing page. We have already seen precisely this problem with Vinçard. Once one is certain that all the impressions have dried, the protective tissue sheets may be removed and discarded. Many collectors, however, prefer to keep them, even at the risk of allowing the tissue itself to stain or yellow the paper of the edition, should it not be made from acid-free, pH-neutral stock.

Le Trèfle noir, cover.

The unfolded cover of the small-format collection (15.5 cm high by 9.5 cm wide), Le Trèfle noir by Henri de Régnier, first edition, printed on handmade laid paper in 1895. It is a collection of three short stories (Hertulie, Histoire d'Hermagore, and Hermocrate), which earned Régnier's island in Jarry's Gestes et Opinions du docteur Faustroll, pataphysicien the name Island of Her. One can readily see that neither the author's name nor the title of the book nor the publisher's name appears on this cover. There is only a large black clover printed on the front and a smaller one on the back.

Ubu Roi, cover.

The cover of the second edition of Alfred Jarry's Ubu Roi, published in 1897. With the exception of this cover, which was printed in letterpress, the remainder of the book was printed by lithographic autography, reproducing Jarry's handwriting and that of Claude Terrasse for the musical scores. The book is in the traditional in-18 format used by the Mercure de France, but Jarry obtained permission from his friend Alfred Vallette, the publisher and director of the Mercure de France, to replace the customary caduceus with a portrait of Père Ubu, which he had engraved on wood himself. It is worth noting that the first edition of Ubu Roi, published in 1896, is entirely in letterpress, has the same small format as Le Trèfle noir, and also bears the engraved portrait of Père Ubu on its cover.

Ubu Roi, title page.

The title page of the second edition, reproduced by autography in Jarry's own hand. It should be noted that no one has ever heard tell of, read about, or actually seen any such literary Forêt vierge by Alfred Jarry and André-Ferdinand Herold, apart from the reference on page 4 of this second edition.

Le Conte de l'Or et du Silence, cover.

The cover of Gustave Kahn's Conte de l'Or et du Silence, first edition, published in 1898. This is the absolute standard design of the Mercure de France: yellow paper, in-18 format, a large dark-yellow caduceus, and a small black winged petasus. The design of the caduceus would change slightly over the years, but the overall aesthetic remained much the same. A few rare titles abandoned the yellow paper in favor of another color. Francis Jammes's collection of poems La Vierge et les Sonnets, for instance, appeared in dark blue in 1919. But such changes of color were exceedingly rare exceptions, worthy of a little Alfred Jarry-style Pataphysics.

My choice of this particular title by Gustave Kahn is not entirely the result of some random hand rummaging through my library. It is here to announce the publication, some time ago now, of a new edition of this novel by my very old friend Richard Shryock, the greatest specialist in Gustave Kahn in the world — and, indeed, throughout the known universe and several neighboring galaxies. This new edition, with a foreword jointly written by the masterly hands of my friend Richard and Samuel Kunkel, appeared in 2025 from Éditions du Lérot, which has long since ceased dreaming very much, and the Friends of Alfred Jarry United. It should be noted that the Conte de l'Or et du Silence is one of the twenty-seven paired books of Doctor Faustroll. Which explains the presence of Jarry and his friends.

Le Conte de l'Or et du Silence, cover of the reissue .

As one can see, this resplendent cover is all blood and gold. An allusion to southwestern France, perhaps? One might well doubt it, since Gustave Kahn was born in Metz. So perhaps it is a matter of color symbolism. Gold is readily explained by the Gold in the title. But does the red symbolize Silence? Perhaps… if we remember that in heraldry the French word for red is gueules, and that the expression « Ta gueule ! » — literally something along the lines of "shut your trap!" — is an invitation to silence addressed to an interlocutor who has become altogether too talkative. Which, I fear, is precisely what I have been today. I shall therefore fall silent…

My First Impressions of the Stanhope Press
 

Well… now that my back is giving me a bit of a break and a few pills are beginning to ease my stiff neck (these old fogeys on the verge of senility are such a nuisance: they’re always moaning, even when they’re feeling fine), I find myself thinking: “Come on, old boy! Time to have a play with your new toy, your beloved Stanhope press, which you haven’t laid a finger on since you gave it a thorough clean!”

A bit of rummaging here, there, up and down (my workshop occupies two floors), and I gather together everything I need. Wood type only. Some of it came from Paris, back when I still had a workshop there; the rest I recently bought from the printer in Sézanne, whose print shop has, sadly, closed its doors for good.

And so I gather it all together, and gather some more… piling everything up and arranging it on the bed of the Stanhope. Now comes the job of setting the type and laying out the poster. I’ll give you a little taste of the process in pictures, so you can see for yourselves that hand-setting type, even with large, lightweight letters that are easy to handle, takes longer than you might think.

As you’ve seen, the typefaces are quite varied in style, and the letters come in a range of sizes. I decided on a centred layout, a very traditional choice for this sort of job, and tackled it in two stages. First, I worked out the centre of the top line, then aligned the centre of every other line with it. I filled out the other side of each line with spacing material, surrounded the composition with furniture, fitted the quoins, and tightened everything up in the chase.

With the forme finished and locked up, I placed a blank sheet of paper over the type — rather casually, to put it mildly (no problem there: the sheet was larger than the forme) — and stuck it to the tympan with some bargain-basement tape, in a thoroughly ham-fisted fashion. Not exactly textbook practice, but then again, this was a first attempt…

After that, it’s all very straightforward: rolling on the ink with a hand roller (a medium-sized one with a single handle), then pulling a print. Let’s carry on with the pictures…

You can see my rather rough-and-ready taping job

Right, time to ink up.

You’ve just had a quick look — and you’re welcome to watch it again if it went by too fast — at the process of inking the type with a medium-sized hand roller. Naturally, I used the lovely inking table I made a few weeks ago. But I didn’t feel up to using the two-handled roller; it’s a bit too heavy for me at the moment. I’ll have to start taking vitamins, since you can no longer buy Vin Tonique Mariani, the coca-infused tonic wine made with Peruvian coca leaves (what a shame!), which used to put a bit of strength into our grandparents back in the early twentieth century.

Once the type was inked, the next step was, quite logically, to pull a proof on a sacrificial sheet of paper. That would tell me two things: whether I’d attached the sheet to the tympan reasonably well, and whether the impression itself was satisfactory.

I fold the tympan down over the type and slide it underneath the platen.

I grab the lever to bring the platen down.

With the press stroke complete, I pull the forme back out from under the platen. What’s going to happen?…

A rather faint impression (not enough pressure on the middle lines), and a lovely little typo caused by transposing two letters: “AL” instead of “LA”. Well done, Mr Typesetter!

Let’s show that picture twice, just to make sure I feel properly guilty about the typo. I’ll also have to try to fix the lack of pressure.

The letters have been put back in the right order. I’ve quickly knocked together three makeshift packing stops using scraps of brass rule and two-point leads. I’ve also stuck a small piece of card onto the sacrificial sheet to provide extra pressure on the middle lines. After inking the type again (you do ink it for every single sheet, don’t you?), I position a fresh sheet of paper for printing.

Positioning the sheet. Those hastily improvised stops don’t exactly make the job any easier

Almost there. Let’s hope it doesn’t slip off while I lower the tympan.

I hold the loose corner, opposite the gripper edge…

Both hands on the lever…

…and put my whole heart into it…

Out it comes from under the platen for the second time… Better? Worse?

The type was thoroughly loaded with ink, and the packing stops weren’t exactly up to much. The result? The sheet stuck to the forme.

Peeling it off.

Hmm, yes, that’s better…

(poster text: "Rebellion is the privilege of the young. So, young people, stop growing old!")
Not perfect, but readable…

Right, time for an aperitif, now…

P.S. This post should have gone up on fornax.fr yesterday, 26 October 2026, when I finished writing it. But my website is down. No idea why. I contacted my hosting provider and spoke on the phone to a very pleasant chap in technical support. They’re trying to work out what’s wrong, but so far they haven’t found the problem. So, watch this space — assuming they manage to fix it… (P.S. added on 27 October 2026, hence the date!)

Better Vinçard Late Than Never!
 

“That's it! You've gone and wasted more money on something you don't need…”
“Er, what's it to you, you miserable little twerp?!”
“…None of my business, I know, and I absolutely love sticking my nose into things that don't concern me. I admit it! So you've bought yourself another book…”
“…for my technical library, yes. And your point is…? What's wrong with that? And I would appreciate it if you addressed me as ‘Sir’ from now on. A simple matter of respect, on your part.”
“Well, as I understand it, the book you've just bought is one you've already got… in photographs, I mean, photos you took yourself…”
“I see our little twerp is rather well informed. What he doesn't seem to understand, however, is the difference between reality and an image of reality. As Comrade Korzybski puts it—and he's not the only one—‘The map is not the territory.’ And a picture of a book is not the book itself. It has none of the book's weight, its feel, its smell… And there is far more pleasure in leafing through a real book than in scrolling through pictures on a screen, which, on top of everything else, may tire your eyes—or at the very least tire them a good deal more than reading a good book by the light of a good candle…”
“A good candle…”
“Yes, or, if you're a thoroughgoing modernist, by the light of a not-too-bright electric lamp. And, needless to say, while sitting comfortably in a nice, soft armchair.”
“Well, well! You certainly know how to tell us things…”
“Go on, mock me, mock me, you ignorant Philistine… always glued to one screen or another.”
“I imagine, Sir, that you are also partial to making notes on fresh clay tablets with a wedge-shaped reed.”
“Well now! Perhaps you're not quite the Philistine I took you for, since you seem to know something about the existence of cuneiform inscriptions…”
“Yeah, well, that's all very nice, but it still doesn't beat a cracking good manga downloaded from some dodgy Japanese website!”
“I shall leave you to answer for your own words… though I have my own thoughts on the matter. If you'll excuse me, I'll be off. I have more important things to do… like leafing through my new book, for instance…”

Chance—that suspicious entity which more often than not plays some thoroughly nasty tricks on us—was responsible for the arrival, just this very morning, of a book I had never dared hope to place on the shelf reserved for typography manuals in my technical library. It all began with an exchange of emails, sent using my pedal-powered computator, its brass gears painstakingly filed by hand, and connected to my hand-operated printing press by a bicycle chain. The emails were with a correspondent whose name I shall not reveal, in order to spare him any unwanted attention. We were discussing printers' correction marks. We talked about Castillon's manual (1783), Brun's manual (1825), and I mentioned Vinçard's L'Art du typographe (1806), a manual I rather like. The page devoted to printers' correction marks in Vinçard's book was not printed in good, honest, solid hot-metal type, as Brun's was, but by intaglio printing. This was despite the fact that intaglio is more expensive, more complicated, and less logical to use in a book devoted to typography. The reason is simple: it is much easier to produce the marks that way, and the result is closer to the handwritten signs used by proofreaders.

Once our email exchange had come to an end, it occurred to me to have a look at the online bookshops and antiquarian booksellers' websites to see what old typography manuals might be available. I have quite a number of them already, but there are still gaps on my shelves. Every now and then—though not very often—I check those websites, which I shall leave unnamed, to see whether one or another might have come up for sale. I do so without much hope, I must confess, because the ones missing from my shelves are precisely those that are rarest and hardest to find. Please don't take this confidence as an invitation to burgle my house: it is under electronic surveillance, and you might well get caught.

And then, there it was. A Vinçard for sale! No sooner said than done: I bankrupt myself! Well, admittedly, it wasn't the 1806 edition, but the second edition, published in 1823. Not as good. Not as complete. Revised, corrected, and expanded, yet somehow less complete than the 1806 edition. No samples of coloured inks, no examples of heavy papers coloured throughout the sheet for making covers. You know all this, of course, because you've read the wonderful book Jacques André and I wrote, Histoire de l'écriture typographique au XIX^e siècle français (A History of French Typography in the Nineteenth Century). You haven't? Well, what on earth are you waiting for? <self-promotion>You can find it →here, complete with a splendid preface by my friend Didier Barrière</self-promotion>. In the book, I don't say much about the 1823 reprint, but I do quote a little note that made me smile. It was added by Alkan the elder to the copy held in the library at Estienne:

So does this second edition have nothing going for it? Of course it does! It has the merit of existing, and I have the merit of having bought it. Besides, my copy has a few rather amusing peculiarities of its own. Its binding is somewhat unremarkable and a little clumsy. There is nothing particularly noteworthy about it, unless you count the decorative border made with a roll tool—which, admittedly, isn't much to write home about either!

Flat binding.

The title label, however, has a particularly amusing feature, especially for a typography manual. It reads:

ART
DU
TIPOGRA

Of course, it isn't the missing PHE that makes me smile. It's the I in TIPO. One can only assume that the person who did the lettering was Italian and inadvertently followed the spelling of his mother tongue.

Title label.

More troublesome for me, as the new owner of this copy, is the absence of leaves 27–28, which some disrespectful two-legged creature has torn out. Fortunately, I can remedy this by copying the photographs I took of the corresponding pages in the copy held at Estienne. But this loss is compensated for—by a curious paradox—by the presence of a duplicated gathering. My copy contains two sets of leaves 49–50, 51–52, 53–54, and 55–56. Very useful, really. If you haven't quite grasped those pages the first time around, you can simply read them again without having to turn back! Had this book not been destined to rest on a shelf in my technical library, it might well have earned a place in my little library of bookish teratology—the study of bibliographical monstrosities.

Let us now forget these “peculiar peculiarities” and turn our attention to the contents of the book, and to the differences between this edition and the first. First, since this was the very subject that started the email exchange which led to my purchase, I'll show you the page illustrating the printers' correction marks. It was printed by intaglio.

Correction marks plate.

One of the distinctive features of Vinçard and his manual, right from the first edition of 1806, is his proposal for a new type-case layout, which he called hamapolygrammatique. He had patented it as early as 1804.

The 1804 patented type case.

Having had a second look at the complexity of his invention, he simplified it when his manual appeared in 1806, and made no further changes when the book was reissued in 1823.

The 1823 type case.

The fact that this manual went through two editions during the nineteenth century—a period when technological developments were occurring at an almost daily pace—gives us an opportunity to observe how printing practices evolved. In 1806, ink balls were still the principal means of inking the formes, although the inking roller had made its appearance in the final years of the previous century. Vinçard's 1806 manual therefore illustrates the ink balls in much the same way as the Encyclopédie had done.

1806 plate: the ink balls. The two fingers holding the book open for the photograph belong, of course, to yours truly.

The 1823 edition has much the same illustration, more or less… but this time the inking roller makes an appearance, because by then its use had become widespread.

Ink balls and roller plate from the 1823 edition, with the captions on the right-hand page.

Ink balls and roller plate only.

And there we are. I have the feeling that, for once, I've been a little long-winded. I'll try to be more concise next time. Well… I hope so, anyway…

Recollections of a Presenile Old Codger [2]
 

Those who know me vaguely, perhaps even those who think they know me rather better, or even know me well, not to mention the ordinary two-legged creatures who don't know me at all, are liable to think—when they think, that is, which not everyone does—that I am first and foremost a printer, and that, as a printer, I am nothing more than a foul-mouthed, backward-looking devotee of old-fashioned hot-metal typesetting. Or next to nothing else. If that's what you think of me, potential reader, assuming you actually exist, or young lady reader of my dreams, "ce que tu te goures, ce que tu te gourres" (Both spellings are possible in French, even though Queneau opted for the first.) Approximatively: boy (or girl), are you wrong! Wrong, wrong! Of course, there's a grain of truth in these misleading assumptions, but that's by no means the whole story.

I learned typography, because everything can be learned, even the trade of international criminal or head of state (which amounts to much the same thing). I learned it to make books, and only to make books, so that I could master every aspect of the process, from writing my own texts—or choosing someone else's—to the finished product, taking in the layout, any illustrations, the printing, and the folding of the printed sheets along the way. But before I learned that damned hot-metal typography, I had learned screen printing with some friends who, like me, had taken part in the events of May 1968. And it was by screen printing that I made my very first book.

The year was 1973. I was in my first year at Estienne, the Paris printing school, but I had already had my own screen-printing workshop for some time, a workshop I had built with my own fair hands, apart from the squeegees and the ink, which I bought from Tripette et Renaud. At Estienne in the 1970s, you simply did not talk about screen printing. Screen printing was taboo. Letterpress, offset, and rotogravure were our trinity of goddesses, to whom we were expected to give thanks at every hour of the day and night. Things have changed since then. Screen printing is now accepted there, and the religion of Estienne has become monotheistic. These days, they worship that cow, IO—or rather, 1 0—the goddess of all things digital.

So, 1973. Classes were over, summer was beginning, and with it came an overwhelming urge to make a proper book. I mentioned the idea to a friend (someone I rarely see these days), and we decided to work out the contents together. Twelve texts that might be called poems (or might not…), six by each of us. Each of us would illustrate three of our own texts and three of the other's. I would take care of the layout and the actual production, using screen printing, while my collaborator went off on holiday.

I was bursting with enthusiasm, filled with an indescribable happiness at the prospect of embarking on this adventure. It was my first real book layout, and I conceived it so that the book would be impossible to leaf through. When you hold it in your hands and try to turn the pages, all you see is blank paper. I was rather pleased with myself, I can tell you. I then hand-lettered the texts with a brush on the transparent film used to expose the screens, and turned our drawings into films for printing as well. July and a good part of August went by in the making of the book, right through to the final assembly. Sixty copies, in A4 format, five of them not for sale.

It was while making this book that I discovered the wonderful possibilities of manual screen printing. Of all printing techniques, it is the only one within the reach of ordinary mortals like us that allows white (or any other light colour) to cover black (or any other colour) without becoming dirty, remaining truly white or retaining its original hue. A quasi-mystical technique that makes immaculate conception possible, even for donkeys and great big oxen. A genuine miracle for those of sound mind!

To tell you that I am still proud of this book today would be an exaggeration. I still appreciate the practical achievement, certainly… but as for the contents… The title of the book is an exquisite corpse that my friend and I came up with together, the first and best of a little series. The cover drawing was done by Nicolas Stavropoulos, who was in charge of the visual arts workshop in Villejuif, where we attended classes in drawing—still life, the nude, clothed poses—and in lino and woodcut printing. We printed our engravings, of all things, on a lithographic press!

There is no need to be ashamed of one's early work. This book is the first tangible witness to an evolution that was my own. The same is true of anyone who ventures into creative work, unless he or she is irredeemably hopeless. So, here it is. I'm not passing judgment on it. I'm simply showing it to you.

Click to browse and read

As those curious enough to leaf through the PDF I made from a copy in my personal collection will have noticed, this book contains a great many blank pages. The explanation lies in the structure of the layout. Each text is illustrated by an image, and the text and image are printed on one side only of a separate sheet. They face one another, tucked inside a four-page folder, whose first page bears the title of the text. The first six texts are by Michel Tabanou, who illustrated the first three; I illustrated the last three. The next six texts are mine: Tabanou illustrated the first three, and I illustrated the last three.

You are perfectly entitled to like it or dislike it. Make the most of that freedom, in every possible way, while you can. Before long, freedom of opinion may no longer be quite what it is today…

A Quixotic Table of Contents
 

To my friend Jean-Paul Goujon

“You didn’t post your usual piece last Monday…”
“Nope…”
“Couldn’t be bothered?”
“Nope. I was ill…”
“Oh! And that stopped you writing your post?”
“Well, yes… I wasn’t much in the mood. I decided the best way to nurse myself back to health was to do absolutely nothing.”
“And did it work?”
“Well, yes, a little. It does you good to do nothing every now and then. Gives you a rest. And rest can be a bit of a cure in itself, sometimes.”
“Yes, but not always…”
“No, not always… but in this case, yes. A little…”
“And are you going to write your post after all?”
“Well, yes. I’m writing it right now…”
“Oh, I see… In that case, I’ll leave you to it.”
“Thank you…”

I’m not one to complain, but some people are really quite… Anyway, let’s move on.

Now, let’s see… Ah, yes! A little while ago, certain people—ill-mannered souls, no doubt—responded to my work with a rather eloquent curl of the lip and remarks along the lines of: “Er, don’t take this the wrong way, but all that stuff you write about printing and technology… well, how shall I put it? We couldn’t give a damn!” Always a pleasure to hear, isn’t it? So, just to be absolutely clear, I’m not changing the subject to please them. Not at all. I’m changing it because, as someone once said, I simply can’t be bothered to carry on with the usual stuff. I’m not feeling particularly sprightly or full of beans just yet.

I’ve therefore decided to indulge the devotees of fin-de-siècle literature—that is, literature from the end of the nineteenth century—and its early twentieth-century successors. Some fifty years ago, there weren’t all that many of us who knew about this literature, let alone appreciated it. Nowadays, you can hardly get a foot in the door for the crowds. Times change. It’s like the weather: things are warming up.

So here’s what I propose. I’ve taken an issue of a literary magazine from a shelf in my library—one within easy reach, which isn’t true of all of them. I picked it more or less at random. Did chance do me a good turn? I think it did, but you can be the judge.

Les Chimères

A poetry magazine, published on the fifteenth of every month

Paris, 76 rue du Rocher

Volume II, No. 11 — 15 February 1909 — 28 pages
Editor-in-chief: Adrien Bertrand
Editorial committee: Guy Robert du Costal, Alfred Machard, Claude-Léon Mercerot, Vincent Muselli, Henri Grach
Secretary-general: Henry Bertrand
Administrator: René Emanuelli

Contents

Émile Boissier, “Annick” — A poem dedicated to Frédéric Mistral, consisting of eleven quatrains in ten-syllable lines.

Guy Robert de Costal, “Sonnets” — Two monosyllabic sonnets, the first of which I simply cannot resist quoting, in french, of course:

La More

Dort
Son
Corps
Blond

Sur
Le
Lit
Dur.

Frêle
Sœur
Qui

Gît !
Pâle
Fleur…

Roger Vincent, “Souvenir” — “Chanson” — “Idylle anglaise” — Three poems: a sonnet; a poem comprising six quatrains of three seven-syllable lines and one two-syllable line; and a poem of ten quatrains in eight-syllable lines.

Adrien Bertrand, “La Douleur” — A poem dedicated to Théo Mittelsten Scheid, consisting of six six-line stanzas in alexandrines.

Alfred Machard, “Une escapade” — A short story featuring the child characters the author was so fond of.

E. Aubel, “Sonnet” — A sonnet in alexandrines, dedicated to Louis Perris.

Gaston Guilleré, “Mimodrame” — A sort of prose poem featuring the character of Pierrot.

Vincent Muselli, “Poème” — A poem consisting of three quatrains in alexandrines, dedicated to Édouard Marye.

André Petit, “L’Éveil de l’été” — A sonnet in alexandrines.

Edmée Delebecque, “Supplique” — “Dédicace” — Two poems in alexandrines: the first consists of seven quatrains, the second of sixteen lines.

Xavier Thylda, “Celles qui passent…” — “Dormeuse” — “Stances” — Three poems in alexandrines: two sonnets and a poem of two quatrains dedicated to Guy Robert du Costal.

André Petit, “Nuit” — A sonnet in alexandrines.

“Une Matinée” — An anonymous review of a literary matinée held at the Lemoine Hall, 17 rue Pigalle.

Finally, a statement by Adrien Bertrand announcing his resignation as editor-in-chief of the magazine so that he could take up the mantle of secretary to the committee charged with erecting a monument in honour of Catulle Mendès, who had recently ceased to be immortal.

***

“Tell me, sorry to butt in again… These chaps in your magazine aren’t exactly household names, are they?”
“No, they aren’t.”
“And if they seem rather partial to women, they don’t appear to pay them much attention. Not a single woman in the contents… So why are you bothering to write about them?”
“Oh, just to make them a little better known…”
“Right… Fair enough. But do you really think your pathetic little blog post is going to make your second-rate poets famous?”
“No, probably not… But perhaps some newly converted fin-de-siècle enthusiast might be tempted to dig a little deeper and take an interest in one or another of them. You never know…”
“Hmm… Possibly. But now that I think about it, your obscure dreamers seem a pretty reactionary bunch, what with their sonnets on every street corner. Not exactly modernists, are they? They don’t seem to invent much, with all that ice-cold classicism of theirs. They churn out alexandrines by the yard…”
“Fair point… But they do help us build up a little picture of the period. The Symbolists are more or less behind us, and Dada won’t be long in coming. In the meantime, there they are, these fellows… still here, just before the Great War comes along and kills them.”
“Hmm…”